EDUCATION COUNCIL

of the
NEBRASKA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION

Thursday, April 16, 2009, 1:00-4:00PM CT

 

Host site: Public Service Commission Hearing Room, Atrium 3rd Floor, 12th & N Streets, Lincoln
Remote Site 1: ESU 10, 76 Plaza Boulevard, Kearney
Remote Site 2: Connell Hall, Wayne State College, 1000 Main, Wayne
Remote Site 3: Tekamah High School, 112 N. 13th St., Tekamah

 

VOTING MEMBERS/ALTERNATES PRESENT:

 

Mr. Arnold Bateman, University of Nebraska (Lincoln site)

Dr. Michael Chipps, Mid-Plains Community College (Lincoln site)

Mr. Ron Cone, ESU 10 (Kearney)

Dr. Terry Haack, Bennington Public Schools (Lincoln site)

Mr. Stephen Hamersky, Daniel J. Gross Catholic High School (Lincoln site)

Mr. Jeff Johnson, Centennial Public Schools (Lincoln site)

Mr. Chuck Lenosky, Creighton University (Lincoln site)

Mr. Dennis Linster, Wayne State College (Wayne site)

Mr. Art Tanderup, Tekamah-Herman Community Schools (Tekamah site)

Dr. Bob Uhing, University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Kearney site)

 

LIAISONS/ALTERNATE MEMBERS PRESENT: Ms. SuAnn Witt, Nebraska Dept. of Education, Alt. for Mike Kozak; Steven Stortz, Norfolk Lutheran Schools, Alt. for Steve Hamersky (was present and voting until Steve Hamersky arrived); Mr. Ken Clipperton, Midland Lutheran College, Alt. for Chuck Lenosky

 

MEMBERS/LIAISONS ABSENT: Mr. Stan Carpenter, Nebraska State College System; Mr. Clark Chandler, Nebraska Wesleyan University; Dr. Eileen Ely, Western Nebraska Community College; Dr. Marshall Hill, Coordinating Commission for Postsecondary Education; Ms. Yvette Holly, UN Medical Center; Mr. Craig Pease, Ashland-Greenwood Public Schools; Ms. Linda Richards, Ralston Public Schools; Ms. Brenda Decker, DAS-CIO; and Mr. Michael Winkle, NET

 

CALL TO ORDER, ELECTRONIC POSTING, LOCATION OF OPEN MEETING LAW DOCUMENTS, ROLL CALL, INTRODUCTIONS

 

Dr. Chipps called the meeting to order at 1:04 p.m.  There were nine voting members present at the time of roll call.  A quorum existed to conduct official business.  The meeting notice was posted to the NITC Web site and the Nebraska Public Meeting Calendar on February 24, 2009.  The meeting agenda was posted to the NITC Web site on April 13, 2009.

 

CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA FOR THE APRIL 16, 2009 MEETING

 

Mr. Bateman moved to approve the April 16, 2009 agenda as presented.  Mr. Stortz seconded.  Bateman-Yes, Chipps-Yes, Cone-Yes, Haack-Yes, Stortz-Yes, Johnson-Yes, Linster-Yes, Tanderup-Yes, and Uhing-Yes.  Results:  Yes-9, No-0.  Motion carried.

 

Mr. Lenosky arrived at the Lincoln site.

 

CONSIDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE FEBRUARY 5, 2009 MEETING

 

Mr. Johnson moved to approve the February 5, 2009 minutes as presented.  Mr. Bateman seconded.  Roll call vote: Uhing-Yes, Tanderup-Yes, Linster-Yes, Lenosky-Yes, Johnson-Yes, Hamersky-Yes, Haack-Yes, Cone-Yes, Chipps-Yes, and Bateman-Yes.  Results:  Yes-10, No-0.  Motion carried.

 

There was some concern from members regarding the timeliness of receiving the meeting minutes.  The record of minutes should be posted within the ten days of a public meeting.  Staff will make every attempt to get them posted within this time frame. It was noted that the agenda and minutes were posted on Monday.

 

PUBLIC COMMENT

 

There was no public comment.

 

EDUCATION PORTAL UPDATE

Jessica Zywiec, Project Manager, Nebraska.gov

 

Nebraska.gov has been in contact with the task group members on additional information that is needed for the website.  Jessica has received information for needed links from some of the group members.  Since March 31st was the deadline for the group to get information to Jessica, Nebraska.gov will proceed with development of the website and will continue to be in contact with the Education Council.

 

There will be a prototype demonstration of the portal to at the June Education Council meeting.

 

Council members raised the issue of the maintenance of the portal’s links.  Nebraska.gov has discussed this issue.  One approach being considered is to have one “links” database.  This would make maintenance easier. Council members requested a link to the updated portal to review prior to the June meeting.

 

The question was raised as to whether the Education Portal should be one of the council’s action items.  Mr. Rolfes stated that it could go under the eGovernment NITC initiative with the Education Council taking the lead.  Issues and concerns regarding the maintenance and update of the portal would be addressed by the Education Council.  Several members stressed the potential importance of the website to educators, parents and citizens.

 

Mr. Hamersky arrived at the Lincoln site.

 

NITC UPDATE: COMMISSION, TECHNICAL PANEL, COUNCILS

Tom Rolfes, Education I.T. Manager

 

Nebraska Information Technology Commission; March 3, 2009 Meeting

· Received reports from all five Councils and Technical Panel

· Received informational updates about OCIO, Network Nebraska projects

· Forwarded the deficit request from the University of Nebraska for the SIS/SAP project

· Approved the recommended designations for Enterprise Project and Project Reporting

http://www.nitc.nebraska.gov/nitc/meetings/documents/20090303/EP_Recommendations.pdf

 

Council members received the NITC and other advisory council reports prior to the meeting.  Council members did not have any questions regarding the report.  Mr. Rolfes reported that the other I.T. Managers were impressed with the report and plan to utilize it with their councils as well.  Mr. Linster was acknowledged for making this suggestion.  Mr. Rolfes has been checking on the use of stimulus monies for educational purposes.

 

NETWORK NEBRASKA PHASE III UPDATE

Tom Rolfes, Education I.T. Manager

 

Network Nebraska is in the process of making operational decisions to bring in 50 entities for Phase 3 (ESU 13, ESU 9, Lincoln Public Schools, Omaha Public Schools and ESU 3 in La Vista, 3 community colleges).  Currently, the project is working with seven six different vendors in four different geographic locations to provide an overall timeline for the implementation of the 50 entities.  The vendors have been very cooperative.  Customers have been motivated.  Testing will be conducted in August 2009, once all the equipment has been installed and tested.

 

TASK GROUP REPORTS

Funding/Erate. Steve Hamersky.  The task group met in February to review their plan to determine progress and accomplishments. The task group report indicated that the Nebraska sub-networks of education, telehealth, and state government do not appear to be converging. The question was raised as to if and how eRate affects the telehealth network.  Mr. Rolfes explained that the telehealth network has a federal requirement that the network be used only for telehealth purposes or risk loss of funding though cost allocation of ineligible entities.

 

(Meeting started experiencing video conference connection difficulties.  Still picture frame stuck.)

 
Services Task Group. The work group has not met since the last meeting but the following progress has been made:

  • 4.A Prepare for the future of Network Nebraska as a statewide, multipurpose network. Action: Develop an appropriate catalog of services and bandwidth thresholds for Network Nebraska to serve nonpublic K-12 and nonpublic higher education entities. Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

The Network Nebraska website has been updated to show a few of the services but there has been no formal list of services developed.  There has been no progress on bandwidth threshold issues.  It is hoped that a Governance Task Group will be established to address these issues.

  • 4C Action: Implement a statewide on-line presentation and meeting software solution.
    Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP), Technical Panel for needs assessment.

Contact was made with to entities to get feedback regarding the need for? So far, the results indicate that this is not a great need.

  • 3D Action Item - Develop an affordable plan to provide access to learning management system software for every teacher and learner who uses synchronous video distance learning and to also train teachers in effective instructional design to integrate synchronous and asynchronous technologies.  Lead: Distance Education Council

In February, this topic was taken to the Distance Education Advisory committee. Mr. Roethemeyer reported that a committee has established a work group to develop recommendations.  It is anticipated that a recommendation will be made at the June Education Council meeting.

  • 4.E - Encourage higher education entities to list all dual enrollment and concurrent enrollment course opportunities on the statewide clearinghouse and scheduling software system. Lead: Distance Education Council

Efforts are underway to develop more dual credit enrollment opportunities between Educational Service Units 1, 2, 7, 8 and 17 and their associated higher education institutions.  There has been some progress.


Marketing Task Group, SuAnn Witt.  SuAnn Witt and Arnold Bateman met with the CAP (Collaborative Aggregation Partnership) group and the NITC Technical Panel to present the Network Nebraska survey report.  It was well received.  Both groups will discuss next steps regarding the report.  The next step for the task group is to develop a marketing plan by the June meeting.


Governance Task Group, Mr. Linster.  The task group has met once since the last Education Council meeting and will be meeting two more times to formalize the process.  The Council’s input would be appreciated.  It is anticipated that a recommendation for the advisory group structure and membership will be ready by the June meeting.  The Task Group was reminded that equal representation between K-12 and higher education should be top consideration.

 

Task Groups broke into smaller action items work groups to determine review and evaluate the completion and status of the Education Council’s action items.

 

TASK GROUP WORK SESSIONS AND ACTION ITEM PRODUCTS

NETWORK NEBRASKA ACTION ITEMS

 

N1A - Action: The CAP will work with communities that express an interest in aggregating their public sector transport.  Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE AS IS

 

N1B - Action: The CAP will use the Network Nebraska website to showcase examples of successful public sector network and/or Internet service cooperation. CAP will encourage interaction and sharing between public entities. Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE AS IS

 

N2A – Action: The Network Nebraska network design/support team will develop a memorandum of agreement with local and regional education entities in order to develop a cooperative support system for the statewide network that will mitigate data transport and synchronous video problems.  Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE AS IS

 

COMMENT: Currently, there is no written agreement between Network Nebraska and its partners.  Council members discussed the need to generate interest and trust in Network Nebraska.

 

N2B Action: The Chief Information Officer will annually update the State master purchase contracts for edge devices and codec equipment and monitor the local site purchases of such equipment in order to promote and encourage network equipment and codec equipment standardization.  Lead: Chief Information Officer

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE AS IS

 

N3A Action: The CAP will accept new orders for Internet service and continue to aggregate purchasing demand to secure a more economical price for statewide Internet service.  Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE WITH REVISION

 

COMMENT: The Network Nebraska advisory group should consider developing different service levels and pricing.

 

N4A Action: Develop an appropriate catalog of services and bandwidth thresholds for Network Nebraska to serve nonpublic K-12 and nonpublic higher education entities. Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE WITH REVISION

 

COMMENT: The Network Nebraska advisory group should consider developing different service levels and pricing. It was recommended to revise to include all educational entities and to provide more information for non-public education regarding requirements. It would be beneficial to include the Network Nebraska Ad Hoc Committee.  The question was raised as to whether libraries should be included.  There was no decision made at this time regarding libraries.

 

N4B - Action: Charter a work group to research advanced network services for Network Nebraska customers. Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE AS IS

 

N4C Action: Implement a statewide on-line presentation and meeting software solution.  Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP), Technical Panel for needs assessment

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE WITH REVISION

 

COMMENT: Utilize the Network Nebraska Customer Survey to determine the following needs:

§         Online statewide assessments for K12 and effect on schools

§         Online and virtual schools

 

N4D Action: Develop a formula for E-rate cost allocation that allows affordable fees for adult education and other ineligible population services to take place in K-12 settings.  Lead: Distance Education Council

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE AS IS

 

N4E Action: Work to amend Nebraska Department of Education policies to include Pre-K as an eligible population for Universal Service Fund (E-rate) purposes.  Lead: Nebraska E-rate Coordinator

            RECOMMENDATION: DISCONTINUE

 

COMMENT: The work group pursued this with the Nebraska Department of Education legal section and the Legislator’s Education Committee and found it to be not feasible at this point in time.

 

N4F Action: Work to change the federal E-rate policies that create impediments and financial disincentives for collaborative usage of networks and videoconferencing by ineligible populations (Pre-K, adults, telehealth, etc…).  Lead: Nebraska E-rate Coordinator

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE AS IS

 

            COMMENT: The task group hopes to continue advocating for positive and responsive change in the E-rate program at the Federal level.

 

N4G Action: Create a Network Advisory Group and meeting structure for education entities to provide input to Network Nebraska (CAP).  Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE WITH REVISION

 

COMMENT: The Governance Task Group will seek nominations from the Education Council for the Network Nebraska Ad Hoc Committee at the June meeting.  After which time, the task group will confer with the State CIO and include timelines and meeting frequency that will meet the CIO’s request for the first meeting to be held in July. The advisory group will periodically report back to the Education Council who will make further recommendations for governance and leadership.

 

N4H Action: Review the Network Nebraska governance and leadership structure.  Lead: Network Nebraska (CAP)

            RECOMMENDATION: COMPLETED

 

COMMENT: This action item could be declared completed.

 

New action items for Network Nebraska were recommended:

 

N5 Action:  Annually reissue and utilize the Network Nebraska Market Survey Report to drive Network Nebraska decisions.

RECOMMENDATION: CREATE NEW ACTION ITEM

 

N6 Action: Annually update the Network Nebraska Marketing plan.

RECOMMENDATION: CREATE NEW ACTION ITEM

 

N7 Action: Research and pursue grant writing that would assist with deployment of statewide technology services (e.g. MCU/Bridge).

            RECOMMENDATION: CREATE NEW ACTION ITEM

 

 

DIGITAL EDUCATION ACTION ITEMS

 

D1 Action: Set a deadline, and establish standard(s) related to the administration and maintenance of learning management systems and content management systems by K- 12 schools.  Lead: NITC Technical Panel

            RECOMMENDATION: DISCONTINUE OR CONTINUE WITH REVISION

 

COMMENT: This action item should be eliminated due to the council not having the technical expertise. Responsibility should remain with the Technical Panel.  It was recommended to include a statement recommending that the Technical Panel seeks the council’s input.  It was also recommended to work toward a more efficient and agnostic Content Management System rather than a Learning Management System.

 

D2 Action: Negotiate a statewide purchase of the National Repository of Online Courses.

            RECOMMENDATION: COMPLETE

 

D3 Action: Develop an affordable plan to provide access to learning management system software for every teacher and learner who uses synchronous video distance learning and to also train teachers in effective instructional design to integrate synchronous and asynchronous technologies.  Lead: Distance Education Council

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE WITH REVISIONS

 

            COMMENT: Substitute content management system for learning management system. Suggest sustainable funding strategies.

 

D4 Action:  Encourage higher education entities to list all dual enrollment and concurrent enrollment course opportunities on the statewide clearinghouse and scheduling software system.  Lead: Distance Education Council

            RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE WITH REVISIONS

 

            COMMENT: Provide training and encourage all education providers to list all dual enrollment, concurrent enrollment, and all enrichment opportunities on the statewide clearinghouse and scheduling software system.

 

New action items for Digital Education were recommended:

 

D5 Action: Help develop a governance and leadership structure for the administration of online, virtual schools.

            RECOMMENDATION: CREATE NEW ACTION ITEM

 

D6 Action: Monitor the Nebraska Statewide Assessment System (NeSAS) and develop strategies that will assure its continued success and use of the most efficient and scalable technology infrastructure.

            RECOMMENDATION: CREATE NEW ACTION ITEM

 

D7 Action: Promote the deployment and use of the National Repository of Online Courses.

            RECOMMENDATION: CREATE NEW ACTION ITEM

 

OTHER/ANNOUNCEMENTS

 

Mr. Rolfes wanted to alert the council that the following members’ terms are up for renewal:  Stan Carpenter, Michael Chipps, Yvette Holly, Chuck Lenosky, Steve Hamersky, Craig Pease, Art Tanderup, and Bob Uhing.  Mr. Rolfes was directed to contact these subsectors regarding their representation.

 

AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE 6/XX/2009 MEETING, CONSIDER LOCATION FOR THE 6/XX/2009 MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT

 

Mr. Rolfes will poll the members to determine a date for the June meeting.  The meeting will be spent finalizing the action items.  If there are other items council members wish to have on the agenda, they are to contact Mr. Rolfes.

 

Mr. Bateman moved to adjourn.  Mr. Johnson seconded.  All were in favor.  Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 3:12 p.m. CT.

 

Meeting minutes were taken by Lori Lopez Urdiales and reviewed by Tom Rolfes of the Office of the CIO/NITC.